How teams use it

The same engine, five departments, three very different wins.

Three walkthroughs of how a team goes from "we just use the biggest model for everything" to a defensible, monitored, best-value choice — across cloud and on-premise.

Illustrative scenarios. Companies, people and figures below are composite examples built to show how Modeljury is used — not real customers.

Finance / AP · Fintech

NorthLedger

220 staff · ~180,000 invoices / month · cloud-first

The problem

Every incoming invoice was run through a frontier model to pull vendor, date and total. It worked — but at ~180k invoices a month, the bill was eye-watering, and nobody could say whether a cheaper model would do just as well. Switching felt risky without proof.

What Modeljury did

NorthLedger uploaded 300 hand-labelled invoices and set a 95% field-accuracy bar. The bake-off ran the full roster head-to-head: a mid-tier model cleared 96% at a fraction of the cost. Monitoring stayed on — six weeks later a newly-launched model cleared the same bar even cheaper, and the pick auto-switched.

96%
field accuracy
(bar was 95%)
~6×
cheaper per
invoice
1
auto-switch
in 6 weeks
We were defaulting to the most expensive option out of fear. Modeljury gave us the proof to switch — and then did it again for us when something cheaper shipped.— Priya N., Head of Finance Ops (illustrative)
Support / CX · B2B SaaS

Helmsly

90 staff · ~40,000 tickets / month · data-residency rules

The problem

Support ticket triage routed every message to the right team. But Helmsly's enterprise customers had contractual data-residency clauses — ticket content couldn't leave their environment. That ruled out most cloud APIs before cost was even on the table.

What Modeljury did

They flipped on the "data can't leave our environment" rule, which pruned the cloud candidates automatically. The bake-off then compared the self-hosted open models that survived. One cleared their 90% bar at a tiny per-call cost — and, crucially, ran entirely on their own hardware.

100%
on-prem
(zero data egress)
92%
triage accuracy
(bar was 90%)
$0.02
per 1k
calls
Compliance used to be a reason we couldn't use AI at all. Here it just pruned the list — and the model that won happened to be the one we could run ourselves.— Marcus T., VP Engineering (illustrative)
Trust & Safety · Marketplace

Tindle Market

350 staff · ~2M items / month · strict provider rules

The problem

Content moderation ran at huge volume, and at 2M items a month, cost and latency both mattered. Policy also forbade routing user content through certain non-domestic providers — a rule that was easy to violate by accident when teams picked models ad hoc.

What Modeljury did

The provider-origin rule excluded the disallowed models up front — they were never even tested. Among the rest, a self-hosted model cleared the bar at scale. Monitoring kept running: when a flagged model later launched, it was skipped on compliance grounds, with the reason logged, before anyone wasted time evaluating it.

2M
items / month
at scale
0
non-compliant models
ever tested
24/7
compliance-aware
monitoring
The best part isn't the model it picked — it's that it refuses to even consider the ones our policy forbids, and tells us why.— Dana R., Director of Trust & Safety (illustrative)

Your task is next

Pick a task, set your rules, and see the verdict — the same flow these scenarios followed.

Try the demo →